![]() ![]() ![]() My big question is: Why do people stay with lives, forms, and fantasies of life that don’t work? And so losing the bad object might be deemed worse than being destroyed by it. But its presence represents the possibility of happiness as such. In all of these scenes of “the good life,” the object that you thought would bring happiness becomes an object that deteriorates the conditions for happiness. This is why I am interested in seeing optimism operate in all kinds of attachment: from intimacy and sexuality to things like voting, or the belief that capitalism is a meritocracy that rewards active competence. So this double bind produces conflicts in how to proceed, because massive loss is inevitable if you stay or if you go.Ĭruel Optimism asks: Why is it so hard to leave those forms of life that don’t work? Why is it that, when precariousness is spread throughout the world, people fear giving up on the institutions that have worn out their confidence in living? When your pen breaks, you don’t think, “This is the end of writing.” But if a relation in which you’ve invested fantasies of your own coherence and potential breaks down, the world itself feels endangered.Ī destructive love affair is my favorite example: if I leave you I am not only leaving you (which would be a good thing if your love destroys my confidence) but also I leaving an anchor for my optimism about life (which is why I want to stay with you even though I’m unhappy, because I am afraid of losing the scene of my fantasy itself). But what makes it cruel is different than what makes something merely disappointing. ![]() I define “cruel optimism” as a kind of relation in which one depends on objects that block the very thriving that motivates our attachment in the first place.Īll attachment is optimistic. The third is about the need for a realism that embeds trauma and suffering in the ordinary rather than in a space of exception, given that the crises of exhaustion and knowing how to live are problems saturating ordinary life. and Europe-in which the consequences of cruel optimism are lived collectively. The second is on a particular scene-the end of the postwar good life fantasy and the rise of neoliberalism in the U.S. The first is the concept of cruel optimism (what’s optimism, what’s cruel about it). Cruel Optimismis a book about living within crisis, and about the destruction of our collective genres of what a “life” is it is about dramas of adjustment to the pressures that wear people out in the everyday and the longue durée it is about the blow of discovering that the world can no longer sustain one’s organizing fantasies of the good life. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |